SCIENCE HIGH SCHOOLS LEAD PHILIPPINE SCHOOLS IN MATH TEST OF TIMSS 2003
Second Year High School students from three science and technology (S&T) oriented high schools who participated in the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2003 performed better in mathematics compared to other Philippine sample students from private and public high schools. Their scores are also significantly higher than those of Australia, England, USA, India, Malaysia, and Russia.
The overall performance of Philippine schools in science and mathematics in TIMSS 2003 improved significantly compared to that of the 1999 study. This could be attributed to the fact that, unlike in the 1999 study where the 13 year old students who took the test were only in Grade 7 or First Year High School, majority of the sample students who took the test in 2003 were already at Second Year High School (since the entry age of Filipino students to Grade 1 was lowered from 7 years old to 6 years old in 1995).
Regional comparisons showed that Grade 4 students from Region IVA scored highest in mathematics and science, while Second Year high school students from CAR were the topnotchers in both subject areas. Regions which showed improvement in their performance in both subjects as compared to their 1999 achievement levels were CAR, Regions I, III, V, VII and XII. Overall achievement ratings revealed that students performed better in mathematics than in science at Grade 4, while at Second Year High School, performance in the two subject areas was almost the same. Students in the private schools scored higher than those in the public schools in both tests at both grade levels, except those from S&T oriented high schools who scored higher in mathematics.
The factors related to achievement were also assessed. In TIMSS 2003 , 4,572 Grade 4 students from 135 schools and 6,917 Second Year High School students from 137 schools participated by taking the achievement test in science and mathematics and by answering the student questionnaire. Teacher questionnaire and school questionnaire (which were answered by the school principals) were also used to determine how the identified factors relate to student performance. Such factors include school resources, instructional materials/equipment, computer use, class size, teacher qualification and language of test.
As expected, students whose schools had a high level of instructional resources performed better in both tests. Grade 4 mathematics students whose teachers used textbooks, computers and Internet in teaching had higher scores. Second Year High School students who used computers in their mathematics class also did better than those who did not. Ironically, those who did not have access to Internet and did not use calculators in their mathematics class scored higher than those who had such equipment in their class. In science, those with Internet access scored significantly higher than those who had no access. Computer use in both subjects may have contributed to better performance of students at both grade levels. Regarding class size, students at grade 4 whose class had only up to 32 students scored higher in mathematics than those whose class had 33 or more students. Second Year High School students with class size of up to 40 students (for both subjects) did better than those with a larger class size.
Teacher qualification revealed that for Grade 4 students, higher student achievement in science and mathematics was associated with the teachers having a graduate degree. The reverse emerged for Second Year High School students. The findings also revealed that teachers who are mathematics majors seem to handle Grade 4 and Second Year High School science and mathematics classes better than the science majors.
Those students who had the opportunity to speak English (the language of the test) at home had significantly higher achievement in both subjects at both grade levels.
Benchmarking the performance of Filipino students with their counterparts in other countries through TIMSS has always been the purpose for participating in this evaluation study. In TIMSS 1999, the Philippines ranked 36th in both mathematics and science among 38 participating countries. TIMSS 2003 placed the country 23rd among 25 countries for both Grade 4 science and mathematics, and 42nd in science and 41st in mathematics among 45 countries for Second Year High School. Looking at this trend, there seems to be no indication of improvement in the ranking of our students in TIMSS 1999 and 2003. However, the overall achievement of the Filipino 13 year old samples in the 2003 study revealed a significant improvement - from 345 mean score in both subjects in 1999 to 377 in science and 378 in mathematics in 2003. This could well be the result of a major educational policy reform on school entry age implemented in 1995.
TIMSS 2003 is the third in a series of international assessment study conducted every four years by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) in Amsterdam and directed by Boston College in collaboration with a global network of organizations and representatives from participating countries. In the Philippines, TIMSS 2003 is being coordinated by an inter-agency group composed of representatives of the Department of Science and Technology-Science Education Institute (DOST-SEI), the Department of Education (DepEd), and the UP National Institute for Science and Mathematics Education Development (UP-NISMED). (Ruby R. Cristobal – S&T Media Service)
The overall performance of Philippine schools in science and mathematics in TIMSS 2003 improved significantly compared to that of the 1999 study. This could be attributed to the fact that, unlike in the 1999 study where the 13 year old students who took the test were only in Grade 7 or First Year High School, majority of the sample students who took the test in 2003 were already at Second Year High School (since the entry age of Filipino students to Grade 1 was lowered from 7 years old to 6 years old in 1995).
Regional comparisons showed that Grade 4 students from Region IVA scored highest in mathematics and science, while Second Year high school students from CAR were the topnotchers in both subject areas. Regions which showed improvement in their performance in both subjects as compared to their 1999 achievement levels were CAR, Regions I, III, V, VII and XII. Overall achievement ratings revealed that students performed better in mathematics than in science at Grade 4, while at Second Year High School, performance in the two subject areas was almost the same. Students in the private schools scored higher than those in the public schools in both tests at both grade levels, except those from S&T oriented high schools who scored higher in mathematics.
The factors related to achievement were also assessed. In TIMSS 2003 , 4,572 Grade 4 students from 135 schools and 6,917 Second Year High School students from 137 schools participated by taking the achievement test in science and mathematics and by answering the student questionnaire. Teacher questionnaire and school questionnaire (which were answered by the school principals) were also used to determine how the identified factors relate to student performance. Such factors include school resources, instructional materials/equipment, computer use, class size, teacher qualification and language of test.
As expected, students whose schools had a high level of instructional resources performed better in both tests. Grade 4 mathematics students whose teachers used textbooks, computers and Internet in teaching had higher scores. Second Year High School students who used computers in their mathematics class also did better than those who did not. Ironically, those who did not have access to Internet and did not use calculators in their mathematics class scored higher than those who had such equipment in their class. In science, those with Internet access scored significantly higher than those who had no access. Computer use in both subjects may have contributed to better performance of students at both grade levels. Regarding class size, students at grade 4 whose class had only up to 32 students scored higher in mathematics than those whose class had 33 or more students. Second Year High School students with class size of up to 40 students (for both subjects) did better than those with a larger class size.
Teacher qualification revealed that for Grade 4 students, higher student achievement in science and mathematics was associated with the teachers having a graduate degree. The reverse emerged for Second Year High School students. The findings also revealed that teachers who are mathematics majors seem to handle Grade 4 and Second Year High School science and mathematics classes better than the science majors.
Those students who had the opportunity to speak English (the language of the test) at home had significantly higher achievement in both subjects at both grade levels.
Benchmarking the performance of Filipino students with their counterparts in other countries through TIMSS has always been the purpose for participating in this evaluation study. In TIMSS 1999, the Philippines ranked 36th in both mathematics and science among 38 participating countries. TIMSS 2003 placed the country 23rd among 25 countries for both Grade 4 science and mathematics, and 42nd in science and 41st in mathematics among 45 countries for Second Year High School. Looking at this trend, there seems to be no indication of improvement in the ranking of our students in TIMSS 1999 and 2003. However, the overall achievement of the Filipino 13 year old samples in the 2003 study revealed a significant improvement - from 345 mean score in both subjects in 1999 to 377 in science and 378 in mathematics in 2003. This could well be the result of a major educational policy reform on school entry age implemented in 1995.
TIMSS 2003 is the third in a series of international assessment study conducted every four years by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) in Amsterdam and directed by Boston College in collaboration with a global network of organizations and representatives from participating countries. In the Philippines, TIMSS 2003 is being coordinated by an inter-agency group composed of representatives of the Department of Science and Technology-Science Education Institute (DOST-SEI), the Department of Education (DepEd), and the UP National Institute for Science and Mathematics Education Development (UP-NISMED). (Ruby R. Cristobal – S&T Media Service)
